<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Softaria</title>
	<atom:link href="http://softaria.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://softaria.com</link>
	<description>the software development company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:51:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cassandra ORM by roman</title>
		<link>http://softaria.com/2011/07/18/cassandra-orm/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>roman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softaria.com/?p=317#comment-30</guid>
		<description>In fact, I can send you source code (without any warranties) of course.
Where should I send it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, I can send you source code (without any warranties) of course.<br />
Where should I send it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EclipseLink versus Hibernate by roman</title>
		<link>http://softaria.com/2011/07/26/eclipselink-versus-hibernate/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>roman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softaria.com/?p=351#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Well, Hibernate was started at 2001 and TOPLink (the original name of EclipseLink) - in the beginning of 1990th. Java version of TOPLink was released in 1998.
So, Hibernate is not older.
It is more widely used, yes.
However being a reference implementation of JPA, EclipseLink is also used by enough number of people to find blockers (if it would have them)
We use it for more than 2 years and did not yet find any. While with Hibernate it was not a trick to start finding them during the first month of usage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Hibernate was started at 2001 and TOPLink (the original name of EclipseLink) &#8211; in the beginning of 1990th. Java version of TOPLink was released in 1998.<br />
So, Hibernate is not older.<br />
It is more widely used, yes.<br />
However being a reference implementation of JPA, EclipseLink is also used by enough number of people to find blockers (if it would have them)<br />
We use it for more than 2 years and did not yet find any. While with Hibernate it was not a trick to start finding them during the first month of usage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EclipseLink versus Hibernate by Hiep</title>
		<link>http://softaria.com/2011/07/26/eclipselink-versus-hibernate/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Hiep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softaria.com/?p=351#comment-28</guid>
		<description>your Fragility factor is not fair. Hibernate is older, it has definitively much bug/blocker/very old blocker than EclipseLink. What if the &quot;small&quot; user community of EclipseLink has not find out all the the bug of EclipseLink in all user cases, and  one days the Eclipse Link will be stack up as many bug/bloker as Hibernate today?
I&#039;m saying that the tables that show number of bugs is interesting for curious peoples but it has no means. it&#039;s be better to point out that EclipseLink is simpler, JPA-only. Hibernate is heavy, multi-purpose so, EclipseLink should be more stable than Hibernate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your Fragility factor is not fair. Hibernate is older, it has definitively much bug/blocker/very old blocker than EclipseLink. What if the &#8220;small&#8221; user community of EclipseLink has not find out all the the bug of EclipseLink in all user cases, and  one days the Eclipse Link will be stack up as many bug/bloker as Hibernate today?<br />
I&#8217;m saying that the tables that show number of bugs is interesting for curious peoples but it has no means. it&#8217;s be better to point out that EclipseLink is simpler, JPA-only. Hibernate is heavy, multi-purpose so, EclipseLink should be more stable than Hibernate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cassandra ORM by Marius Waldal</title>
		<link>http://softaria.com/2011/07/18/cassandra-orm/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Marius Waldal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://softaria.com/?p=317#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I would very much like to see how you use ORM with Cassandra. We have started to use CQL in our application, with Spring JDBC for backing. I would like to see other approaches.

Cheers
Marius</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would very much like to see how you use ORM with Cassandra. We have started to use CQL in our application, with Spring JDBC for backing. I would like to see other approaches.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Marius</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

